Powered By Blogger

Montag, 10. April 2017

JEWISH INSTITUTIONS AND LEADERSHIP

Jewish leadership

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jewish leadership (Hebrew: מנהיגות יהודית‎‎), has evolved over time. Since the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 70 CE, there has been no single body that has a leadership position over the entire Jewish diaspora. Various branches of Judaism, as well as Jewish religious or secular communities and political movements around the world elect or appoint their governing bodies, often subdivided by country or region.

Historic leadership

Biblical leadership (before 70 CE)

During the era of the Tanakh, various forms of leadership developed. There were the heads of the original Hebrew tribes, and then also prophets such as Moses, Jeremiah and Samuel and whose words inspire people to this day, judges such as Samson, kings such as David and Solomon, priests of the Temple in Jerusalem, and the Sanhedrin which was the judiciary.

Mishnaic, Talmudic, Middle Ages leadership (70 to 17th century)

With the demise of ancient kingdoms of Israel and Judah and coinciding with the revolt of the Maccabees against ancient Greece and later Jewish-Roman wars, the sages of the Mishnah and subsequently the Talmud, referred to as the Oral Law in Judaism, took on a growing and central leadership roles. After the destruction of the Second Temple and the subsequent exile for almost two thousand years, the Jews scattered throughout the world turned to their most learned rabbis for local leadership and council.
During Bar Kokhba's revolt against Roman Empire (132-135), the supreme religious authority Rabbi Akiva sanctioned Simon bar Kokhba to be a war leader, whereas during the 2nd century Judah haNasi was not only the supreme temporal leader sanctioned by Rome, but also edited the original work of the Mishnah which became the "de facto constitution" of the world's Jewry. The final editions of the Talmud became the core curriculum of the majority of Jews.
In Babylonia the Exilarch was almost always a rabbinical personality. The Geonim such as Saadia Gaon (892-942) were not only great sages but also political guides. The writings and rulings of those such as Rashi (1040–1105), Maimonides (1135–1204), Yosef Karo (1488–1575) who published the most widely accepted code of Jewish law the Shulkhan Arukh, Isaac Luria (1534–1572), the Vilna Gaon (1720–1797), the Chafetz Chaim (1838–1933) and many others have shaped Jewish law for almost two thousand years, as their religious rulings were published, distributed, studied, and observed until the present time.

Early modern leadership (18th and 19th centuries)

The loose collection of learned rabbis that governed the dispersed Jewish community held sway for a long time. Great parts of Central Europe accepted the leadership of the rabbinical Council of Four Lands from the 16th to the late 18th centuries. In the Eastern Europe, in spite of the rivalry between the schools of thought of the Vilna Gaon (or the GRA, Rabbi Elijah ben Solomon, 1720–1797) of the Mitnagdim, who spoke against Hasidic Judaism and Baal Shem Tov (Rabbi Israel ben Eliezer, 1700–1760), the founder of Hasidic Judaism, rabbis were regarded as the final arbiters of community decisions. Tens of thousands of Responsa and many works were published and studied wherever Jews lived in organized communities. In Western Europe, especially in monarchies, where no equal rights were granted for the Jewish population, radical Maskilim defined the new role of religion as an education of just citizens — like Moses Mendelssohn in his book Jerusalem or On Religious Power and Judaism which was a response to the Prussian reformer Christian Wilhelm von Dohm. The radical tendency of the pedagogic movement went so far, that Mendelssohn's student David Friedländer identified Judaism with the seclusion of modern European culture and secular Judaism could end up in conversion to the religion of the unsecularized state. In contradiction to his teacher early modern leadership turned out to be misled leadership, whose followers ended up as "Jewish citizens without any conscience".

Modern religious leadership (after 19th century)

Decline of rabbinical influence

With the growth of the Renaissance and the development of the secular modern world, and as Jews were welcomed into non-Jewish society particularly during the times of Napoleon in the 18th and 19th centuries, Jews began to leave the Jewish ghettos in Europe, and simultaneously rejected the traditional roles of the rabbis as communal and religious leaders. New leaders such as Israel Jacobson, father of the German Reform Judaism movement, launched an egalitarian, modernist stance that challenged the Orthodoxy. The resulting fractures in Jewish society has translated into a situation whereby there is no single religious governing body for the entire Jewish community at the present time.

Modern Synagogue leadership

In individual religious congregations or synagogues, the spiritual leader is generally the rabbi. Rabbis are expected to be taught in both the Talmud and the Shulkhan Arukh (Code of Jewish Law) as well as many other classical texts of Jewish scholarship. Rabbis go through formal training in Rabbinical texts and responsa, either at a yeshiva or similar institution. "Rabbi" is not a universal term however, as many Sephardic rabbinic Jewish communities refer to their leaders as hakham ("wise man"). Among Yemenite Jews, known as Teimanim, the term mori ("my teacher") is used. Each religious tradition has its own qualifications for rabbis; for more information, see Semicha ("ordination"). In addition to the rabbi, most synagogues have a hazzan (cantor) who leads many parts of the prayer service.

Orthodox and Haredi rabbinic leadership

See also: Orthodox rabbis
In Israel the office of Chief Rabbi has always been very influential. Various Orthodox movements, such as Agudath Israel of America and the Shas party in Israel strictly follow the rulings of their Rosh yeshivas who are often famous Talmud scholars. The last Rebbe of Lubavitch, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the late Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, and Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in Israel are examples of powerful contemporary Haredi rabbis. The Haredi Agudah movements receive and follow the policy guidelines of their own Council of Torah Sages. In the Hassidic movements, leadership is usually hereditary.

Reform, Progressive, Liberal, Conservative, and Reconstructionist leadership

Template:See also 2 In both the Reform and Conservative of Judaism, rabbis are often trained at religious universities, such as the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York City for the Conservative movement, Hebrew Union College for the American Reform movement, and Leo Baeck College for the UK Liberal and Reform Movements. The Reform, Conservative, and Reconstructionist traditions each have their own governing group or individual leaders. Membership in these governing groups are selected by representatives of the Jewish community they serve, with Jewish scholarship considered to be the key factors for determining leaders. These governing bodies make decisions on the nature of religious practice within their tradition, as well as ordaining and assigning rabbis and other religious leaders.
The body of Conservative rabbis is the Rabbinical Assembly, which maintains a Committee on Jewish Law and Standards. The body of Reform rabbis is the Central Conference of American Rabbis.

Secular leadership

Following the Renaissance and the Enlightenment in Europe (with its Jewish "extension" the Haskalah movement, which led to much modern-day assimilation into the cultures of their native countries), the variety of Jewish practice grew, with a widespread adoption of secular values and life-styles. Many modern Jewish communities are served by a variety of secular organizations at the local, national, and international levels. These organizations have no official role in religious life, but often play an important part in the Jewish community. Most of the largest groups, such as Hadassah and the United Jewish Communities, have an elected leadership. No one secular group represents the entire Jewish community, and there is often significant internal debate among Jews about the stances these organizations take on affairs dealing with the Jewish community as a whole, such as antisemitism and Israeli policies.
In the United States and Canada today, the mainly secular United Jewish Communities (UJC), formerly known as the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), represents over 150 Jewish Federations and 400 independent communities across North America. Every major American city has its local "Jewish Federation", and many have sophisticated community centers and provide services, mainly health care-related. They raise record sums of money for philanthropic and humanitarian causes in North America and Israel. Additional local organizations include Jewish Family Services, Jewish nursing homes and Jewish community foundations. Other organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, and the B'nai B'rith represent different segments of the American Jewish community on a variety of issues.

Karaite leadership

A Karaite synagogue is run by a board of directors, and its spiritual leader is often called a Hakham, the equivalent of a "rabbi", and matches one in function. The Gabbai is the treasurer, the Shammash is the custodian, the Hazzan leads prayers, and in some the Ba'al Qeri'ah leads in the reading of the Torah. In America, Karaites are represented by the Karaite Jews of America, and in Israel they are represented.

See also

  • Rabbi
  • Sanhedrin
  • Biblical judges
  • United Monarchy
  • Exilarch
  • Kohen

    Sanhedryn

    Sanhedryn (hebr. סנהדרין Sanhedrin, gr. συνέδριον Synedrion), inaczej Wysoka Rada lub Wielki Sanhedryn (hebr. Sanhedrin Ha-Gdola) – w starożytnej Judei najwyższa żydowska instytucja religijna i sądownicza wspomniana w źródłach po raz pierwszy w 203 roku p.n.e. Sanhedryn zbierał się w Jerozolimie na Wzgórzu Świątynnym i składał się z 71 członków, głównie arystokracji saducejskiej. Od czasu Machabeuszów w skład sanhedrynu wchodzili także faryzeusze. Przewodniczącym (nasim) sanhedrynu był z urzędu arcykapłan.
    Powstał prawdopodobnie już w czasach perskich, po raz pierwszy był wzmiankowany w dekrecie Antiocha III, króla Syrii.
    Początkowo sanhedryn był organem doradczym przy arcykapłanie lub królu, od przejścia Judei pod administrację rzymską (6 rok n.e.) stał się najwyższym – oprócz arcykapłana – autorytetem religijnym i prawnym w kraju. Prócz Wielkiego Sanhedrynu istniało jeszcze w Judei 5 sanhedrynów okręgowych oraz liczne sądy gminne. Po upadku Jerozolimy (70 rok n.e.) nazwę Wielkiego Sanhedrynu zachowały do 358 roku kolegia uczonych w Piśmie (rabinów) rezydujące kolejno w miejscowościach: Jawne (od 68 r.), Usza, Szafaram, Bet Szearim, Seforis i Tyberiada. Urząd nasiego – przewodniczącego Sanhedrynu i patriarchy Żydów przetrwał do 425 r.
    Według tradycji rabinicznej Wielki Sanhedryn istniał nieprzerwanie od czasów Mojżesza do IV w. n.e.
    W 2004 r. w Izraelu zainaugurował działalność nowy Sanhedryn, który znajduje się w fazie organizacji i z tego względu nie nosi nazwy Wielkiego Sanhedrynu, lecz nazwę – "Powstający Sanhedryn". Od 2005 r. jego przewodniczącym jest rabbi Adin Even-Israel (Adin Steinsaltz).


    Sanhedrin

    Dieser Artikel behandelt den jüdischen Hohen Rat. Zum Mischnatraktat 4.4 Sanhedrin siehe Liste der Mischnatraktate.
    Der Sanhedrin (סנהדרין) oder Hohe Rat war lange Zeit die oberste jüdische religiöse und politische Instanz und gleichzeitig das oberste Gericht. Der hebräische Name ist vom griechischen συνέδριον Synhedrion (Versammlung, Rat) abgeleitet.

    Der Sanhedrin zur Zeit des Jerusalemer Tempels

    Die erste historische Erwähnung des Sanhedrin findet sich bei Flavius Josephus. Er berichtet, wie im Jahr 57 v. Chr. Aulus Gabinius das Land in fünf synedria oder synodoi einteilte. Im Traktat Sanhedrin im Talmud ist die Rede von einem großen Sanhedrin mit 71 Mitgliedern und von einem kleineren mit 23 Mitgliedern. Laut Tradition seien sie von Moses einberufen und eine Fortsetzung der Großen Versammlung (Knesset Gedola), die 200 v. Chr. erwähnt wird. Die 71 Mitglieder des Hohen Rates waren Priester, jüdische „Älteste“ und Schriftgelehrte. Abgesehen von einigen pharisäischen[1] Schriftgelehrten waren die Mitglieder wohl hauptsächlich Sadduzäer, die überwiegend den adligen Volksgruppen angehörten. Den Vorsitz hatte der Hohepriester, nach 191 v. Chr. der Nasi.
    Seinen Sitz hatte der Sanhedrin zunächst in Jerusalem. Noch während der römischen Herrschaft über Judäa verfügte die Versammlung über einen erheblichen Einfluss und eine gewisse Autonomie, hatte allerdings vermutlich nicht mehr das Recht, über Tod und Leben zu entscheiden.
    Im Neuen Testament kommt die Bezeichnung Synhedrion in den Evangelien und der Apostelgeschichte 22 Mal vor. Nach neutestamentlicher Überlieferung hatte der Hohe Rat einen wichtigen Anteil am Tod Jesu. Er konnte zwar das Todesurteil nicht selbst vollstrecken, habe Jesus jedoch mit der Anklage eines Messiasanspruchs an den römischen Statthalter Pontius Pilatus überstellt.[2]

    Der Sanhedrin nach der Tempelzerstörung

    Nachdem im Jahr 70 der Jerusalemer Tempel und Jerusalem von den Römern nach einem jüdischen Aufstand zerstört worden waren, erhielt Rabbi Jochanan ben Sakkai von den römischen Herren die Erlaubnis, den Sitz des Hohen Rats nach Jawne zu verlegen; gleichzeitig wurde dort eine jüdische Schule errichtet. Da der Tempel zerstört war, wurde der Hohe Rat nicht mehr vom Hohenpriester, sondern von einem Patriarchen geleitet; gleichzeitig übernahm die frühere Opposition, die Gruppe der Pharisäer, die Führung der Versammlung.

    Die Wiedererrichtung des Sanhedrin

    Die vorherrschende Meinung im Judentum ist, dass erst nach Errichtung des Dritten Tempels ein neuer Sanhedrin gebildet werden wird. Jedoch gab es bereits in den Arbeiten einiger der größten halachischen Autoritäten zumindest Überlegungen, welche Anforderungen für eine Wiedererrichtung gegeben sein müssten. Insbesondere Maimonides erörtert diese Fragestellung in seinem magnum opus zur Halacha, der Mischne Tora, und vertritt die Position, dass ein neuer Sanhedrin durch den Konsens der „Weisen Israels“ zu Stande kommen kann.
    „Es scheint mir, dass wenn alle Weisen des Landes Israel (Eretz Israel) darin übereinkommen, Richter (dayanim) zu ernennen und diesen die Smicha zu erteilen, jene Richter mit Smicha (musmachim) in Strafsachen Urteile fällen und selbst Smichot erteilen können.“[3]
    (Rambam, Mishne Torah, Hilchot Sanhedrin 4:11)
    Ebenso geht der Autor des bis heute als allgemein verbindlich geltenden Halachakompendiums Schulchan Aruch, Rabbi Joseph Karo davon aus, dass ein Konsens aller halachischen Autoritäten prinzipiell die Wiedererrichtung des Sanhedrins ermöglichen würde.[4] Mit Bezug auf die Arbeiten dieser beiden Gelehrten[5], hat eine Gruppe Rabbiner seit 2003 Vorbereitungen zur Wiedereinsetzung des Sanhedrin in Israel unternommen. Dieses sehr umstrittene Vorgehen erhielt mehr Beachtung, als nach einem geheim gehaltenen ersten Nasi im Juni 2005 der angesehene Gelehrte und Rabbiner Adin Steinsaltz den Vorsitz übernahm. Im Juni 2008 erklärte er indes seinen Austritt aus dem Sanhedrin und begründete dies mit Bedenken über die Entwicklung des Rates und seine Sorge über den möglichen Verstoß gegen Halacha.[6]

    Der Sanhedrin im napoleonischen Frankreich

    Am 23. August 1806 wurde unter Napoleon Bonaparte eine „Großer Sanhedrin“ genannte Versammlung von 71 jüdischen Notabeln, darunter Rabbiner unter Vorsitz von David Sinzheim und Laien unter dem Sprecher Abraham Furtado einberufen.[7] Sie sollten auf Basis von Halacha und Tanach Antworten auf Fragen zum Verhältnis von jüdischem und staatlichem Recht finden. Aus ihr ging das heutige Consistoire central israélite hervor.

    Literatur

    Zum napoleonischen Sanhedrin:
  • Carsten Wilke Der Freibrief des Despoten. Zum 200. Jahrestag der Lehrbeschlüsse des großen Sanhedrin. In: Kalonymos. Heft 1/2007 ISSN 1436-1213, S. 4ff.
  • Pierre Birnbaum: Sanhédrin. In: Dan Diner (Hrsg.): Enzyklopädie jüdischer Geschichte und Kultur. (EJGK), Band 5, Metzler, Stuttgart/Weimar 2014, S. 319–323.

Weblinks

  • Rabbi Adin Even-Israel Steinsaltz Elected to Head Sanhedrin Israel National News
  • Website des wiedererrichteten Sanhedrin

    Sanhedrin

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    For other uses, see Sanhedrin (disambiguation).
    The Sanhedrin, from an 1883 encyclopedia
    The Sanhedrin (Hebrew: סַנְהֶדְרִיןsanhedrîn, Greek: Συνέδριον,[1] synedrion, "sitting together," hence "assembly" or "council") was an assembly of twenty-three to seventy-one men appointed in every city in the Land of Israel. In the Hebrew Bible,[2] Moses and the Israelites were commanded by God to establish courts of judges who were given full authority over the people of Israel, who were commanded by God to obey every word the judges instructed and every law they established. Judges in ancient Israel were the religious leaders and Teachers of the nation of Israel. The Mishnah[3] arrives at the number twenty-three based on an exegetical derivation: it must be possible for a "community" to vote for both conviction and exoneration.[4] The minimum size of a "community" is 10 men[5] (10 vs 10). One more is required to achieve a majority (11 vs 10), but a simple majority cannot convict,[6] and so an additional judge is required (12 vs 10). Finally, a court should not have an even number of judges to prevent deadlocks; thus 23 (12 vs 10 and 1). This court dealt with only religious matters.
    The Great Sanhedrin was made up of a Nasi (President), who functioned as head or representing president, but was not a member of the court, an Av Beit Din, the chief of the court, and sixty-nine general members (Mufla).[7] In the Second Temple period, the Great Sanhedrin met in the Hall of Hewn Stones in the Temple in Jerusalem. The court convened every day except festivals and Shabbat. The Sanhedrin is mentioned in the Gospels in relation to the Sanhedrin trial of Jesus and several times in the Acts of the Apostles, including a Great Sanhedrin in chapter 5 where Gamaliel appeared, and in the stoning death of Stephen the deacon in chapter 7.
    After the destruction of the Second Temple and the failure of the Bar Kokhba Revolt, the Great Sanhedrin moved to Galilee, which became part of the Roman Syria Palaestina province and was sometimes referred as the Galilean Patriarchate or Patriarchate of Palaestina, being the governing legalistic body of Galilean Jewry until about 425 CE. In the late 3rd century, to avoid persecution, its authoritative decisions were issued under the name of Beit HaMidrash. Historically, the last binding decision of the Great Sanhedrin appeared in 358 CE, when the Hebrew Calendar was adopted. The Great Sanhedrin was dissolved after continued persecution by the Eastern Roman Empire and aspiring Christendom. Over the centuries, there have been attempts to revive the institution, such as the Grand Sanhedrin convened by Napoleon Bonaparte and modern attempts in Israel.

    History

    Early Sanhedrin

    The Hasmonean court in the Land of Israel, presided over by Alexander Jannaeus, king of Judea until 76 BCE, followed by his wife, was called Synhedrion or Sanhedrin.[8] The exact nature of this early Sanhedrin is not clear. It may have been a body of sages or priests, or a political, legislative and judicial institution. The first historical record of the body was during the administration of Aulus Gabinius, who, according to Josephus, organized five synedra in 57 BCE as Roman administration was not concerned with religious affairs unless sedition was suspected.[9] Only after the destruction of the Second Temple was the Sanhedrin made up only of sages.[8]

    Herodian and early Roman rule

    In the Second Temple period, the Great Sanhedrin met in the Hall of Hewn Stones in the Temple in Jerusalem. The court convened every day except festivals and Shabbat.
    The Sanhedrin — "under the control"[10] of the Roman procurators — is mentioned in the Gospels in relation to the Sanhedrin trial of Jesus and several times in the Acts of the Apostles, including a Great Sanhedrin in chapter 5 where Gamaliel appeared, and in the stoning death of Stephen the deacon in chapter 7.

    During Jewish-Roman Wars

    After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70, the Sanhedrin was re-established in Yavneh with reduced authority. The seat of the Patriarchate moved to Usha under the presidency of Gamaliel II in 80 CE. In 116 it moved back to Yavneh, and then again back to Usha.

    After Bar Kokhba Revolt

    Rabbinic texts indicate that following the Bar Kokhba revolt, southern Galilee became the seat of rabbinic learning in the Land of Israel. This region was the location of the court of the Patriarch which was situated first at Usha, then at Bet Shearim, later at Sepphoris and finally at Tiberias.[11]
    The Great Sanhedrin moved in 140 to Shefaram under the presidency of Shimon ben Gamliel II, and to Beit Shearim and Sepphoris in 163, under the presidency of Judah I. Finally, it moved to Tiberias in 193, under the presidency of Gamaliel III (193–230) ben Judah haNasi, where it became more of a consistory, but still retained, under the presidency of Judah II (230–270), the power of excommunication.
    During the presidency of Gamaliel IV (270–290), due to Roman persecution, it dropped the name Sanhedrin; and its authoritative decisions were subsequently issued under the name of Beth HaMidrash.[citation needed]
    Sanhedrin demise begun in 313 with the Edict of Milan regarding religious tolerance and marking the end of the persecutions against Christians, thus seen as the first step towards Christianity becoming the official state religion of the Roman Empire.[12]
    In 363, emperor Julian ordered the Temple rebuilt.[13] A personal friend of his, Ammianus Marcellinus, wrote this about the effort:
    Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province, when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt. — Ammianus Marcellinus
    The failure to rebuild the Temple has been ascribed to the Galilee earthquake of 363, and to the Jews' ambivalence about the project. Sabotage is a possibility, as is an accidental fire. Divine intervention was the common view among Christian historians of the time.[14] Julian's support of Jews, coming after the hostility of many earlier Emperors, meant that Jews called him Julian the Hellene.[15]
    As a reaction to Julian's pro-Jewish stance, Theodosius I forbade the Sanhedrin to assemble and declared ordination illegal. Capital punishment was prescribed for any Rabbi who received ordination and complete destruction of the town where the ordination occurred.[16]
    However, since the Hebrew calendar was based on witnesses' testimony, that had become far too dangerous to collect, Hillel II recommended change to a mathematically based calendar that was adopted at a clandestine, and maybe final, meeting in 358 CE. This marked the last universal decision made by that body.
    Gamaliel VI (400–425) was the Sanhedrin's last president. With his death in 425, Theodosius II outlawed the title of Nasi, the last remains of the ancient Sanhedrin. An imperial decree of 426 diverted the patriarchs' tax (post excessum patriarchorum) into the imperial treasury.[16] The exact reason for the abrogation of the patriarchate is not clear,[17] though Gamaliel VI, the last holder of the office who had been for a time elevated by the emperor to the rank of prefect,[12] may have fallen out with the imperial authorities.[17] Thereafter, Jews were gradually excluded from holding public office.[18]

    Great and Lesser Sanhedrin

    The Talmud (tractate Sanhedrin) identifies two classes of rabbinical courts called Sanhedrin, a Great Sanhedrin (בית דין הגדול) and a Lesser Sanhedrin (בית דין הקטן). Each city could have its own lesser Sanhedrin of 23 judges, but there could be only one Great Sanhedrin of 71, which among other roles acted as the Supreme Court, taking appeals from cases decided by lesser courts. The numbers of judges were predicated on eliminating the possibility of a tie and the last to cast their vote was the head of the court.

    Function and procedures

    The Sanhedrin as a body claimed powers that lesser Jewish courts did not have. As such, they were the only ones who could try the king, extend the boundaries of the Temple and Jerusalem, and were the ones to whom all questions of law were finally put. Before 191 BCE the High Priest acted as the ex officio head of the Sanhedrin,[citation needed] but in 191 BCE, when the Sanhedrin lost confidence in the High Priest, the office of Nasi was created. After the time of Hillel the Elder (late 1st century BCE and early 1st century CE), the Nasi was almost invariably a descendant of Hillel. The second highest-ranking member of the Sanhedrin was called the Av Beit Din, or "Head of the Court" (literally, Av Beit Din = "father of the house of judgment"), who presided over the Sanhedrin when it sat as a criminal court.[19]
    During Second Temple era, the Sanhedrin met in a building known as the Hall of Hewn Stones (Lishkat ha-Gazit), which has been placed by the Talmud and many scholars as built into the north wall of the Temple Mount, half inside the sanctuary and half outside, with doors providing access both to the Temple and to the outside. The name presumably arises to distinguish it from the buildings in the Temple complex used for ritual purposes, which had to be constructed of stones unhewn by any iron implements.
    In some cases, it was only necessary for a 23-member panel (functioning as a Lesser Sanhedrin) to convene. In general, the full panel of 71 judges was only convened on matters of national significance (e.g., a declaration of war) or in the event that the 23-member panel could not reach a conclusive verdict.[20]
    By the end of the Second Temple period, the Sanhedrin reached its pinnacle of importance, legislating all aspects of Jewish religious and political life within the parameters laid down by Biblical and Rabbinic tradition.

    Summary of Patriarchal powers

    The following is a summary of the powers and responsibilities of the Patriarchate from the onset of the third century, based on rabbinic sources as portrayed by L.I. Levine:[21]
  • Representative to Imperial authorities;
  • Focus of leadership in the Jewish community:
    1. Receiving daily visits from prominent families;
    2. Declaration of public fast days;
    3. Initiating or abrogating the ban (herem);
  • Appointment of judges to Jewish courts in the Land of Israel;
  • Regulation of the calendar;
  • Issuing enactments and decrees with respect to the applicability or release from legal requirements, e.g.:
    1. Use of sabbatical year produce and applicability of sabbatical year injunctions;
    2. Repurchase or redemption of formerly Jewish land from gentile owners;
    3. Status of Hellenistic cities of the Land of Israel re: purity, tithing, sabbatical year;
    4. Exemptions from tithing;
    5. Conditions in divorce documents;
    6. Use of oil produced by gentiles;
  • Dispatching emissaries to diaspora communities;
  • Taxation: both the power to tax and the authority to rule/intervene on the disposition of taxes raised for local purposes by local councils.
Up to the middle of the fourth century, the Patriarchate retained the prerogative of determining the Hebrew calendar and guarded the intricacies of the calculation process in an effort to subdue interference from the Babylonian community. Due to Christian persecution, Hillel II was obliged to fix the calendar in permanent form in 359 CE.[22][23] This institution symbolized the passing of authority from the Patriarchate to the Babylonian Academies.[24]

Archaeological findings

In 2004, excavations in Tiberias conducted by the Israel Antiquities Authority uncovered a structure dating to the 3rd century CE that may have been the seat of the Sanhedrin when it convened in that city. At the time it was called Beit Hava'ad.[25]

Presidents

Main article: Nasi (Hebrew title)
Further information: Tannaim
Before 191 BCE the High Priest acted as the ex officio head of the Sanhedrin,[citation needed] but in 191 BCE, when the Sanhedrin lost confidence in the High Priest, the office of Nasi was created. The Sanhedrin was headed by the chief scholars of the great Talmudic Academies in the Land of Israel, and with the decline of the Sanhedrin, their spiritual and legal authority was generally accepted, the institution itself being supported by voluntary contributions by Jews throughout the ancient world. Being a member of the house of Hillel and thus a descendant of King David, the Patriarch, known in Hebrew as the Nasi (prince), enjoyed almost royal authority.[12] Their functions were political rather than religious, though their influence was not limited to the secular realm.[12] The Patriarchate attained its zenith under Judah ha-Nasi who compiled the Mishnah[12] a compendium of views from Judean thought leaders of Judaism other than the Torah.
President Term in office
Yose ben Yoezer 170 BCE 140 BCE
Joshua ben Perachyah 140 BCE 100 BCE
Simeon ben Shetach 100 BCE 60 BCE
Shmaya 65 BCE c. 31 BCE
Hillel the Elder c. 31 BCE 9 CE
Rabban Shimon ben Hillel 9 9
Rabban Shammai 9 30
Rabban Gamaliel the Elder 30 50
Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel 50 80
Rabban Gamaliel II of Yavne 80 118
Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah 118 120
Interregnum (Bar Kokhba revolt) 120 142
Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel II 142 165
Rabbi Judah I Nesi'ah (Her President) 165 220
Gamaliel III 220 230
Judah II Nesi'ah 230 270
Gamaliel IV 270 290
Judah III Nesi'ah 290 320
Hillel II 320 365
Gamaliel V 365 385
Judah IV 385 400
Gamaliel VI c. 400 425

Revival attempts

The Sanhedrin is traditionally viewed as the last institution that commanded universal Jewish authority among the Jewish people in the long chain of tradition from Moses until the present day. Since its dissolution in 358 CE by imperial decree, there have been several attempts to re-establish this body either as a self-governing body, or as a puppet of a sovereign government.
There are records of what may have been of attempts to reform the Sanhedrin in Arabia,[26] in Jerusalem under the Caliph 'Umar,[26] and in Babylon (Iraq),[27] but none of these attempts were given any attention by Rabbinic authorities and little information is available about them.

Napoleon Bonaparte's "Grand Sanhedrin"

Medallion struck in honor of the "Grand Sanhedrin" convened by Emperor Napoleon I of France.
The "Grand Sanhedrin" was a Jewish high court convened by Napoleon I to give legal sanction to the principles expressed by the Assembly of Notables in answer to the twelve questions submitted to it by the government (see Jew. Encyc. v. 468, s.v. France).
On October 6, 1806, the Assembly of Notables issued a proclamation to all the Jewish communities of Europe, inviting them to send delegates to the Sanhedrin, to convene on October 20. This proclamation, written in Hebrew, French, German, and Italian, speaks in extravagant terms of the importance of this revived institution and of the greatness of its imperial protector. While the action of Napoleon aroused in many Jews of Germany the hope that, influenced by it, their governments also would grant them the rights of citizenship, others looked upon it as a political contrivance. When in the war against Prussia (1806–07) the emperor invaded Poland and the Jews rendered great services to his army, he remarked, laughing, "The sanhedrin is at least useful to me."[citation needed] David Friedländer and his friends in Berlin described it as a spectacle that Napoleon offered to the Parisians.

Modern attempts in Israel

Since the dissolution of the Sanhedrin in 358 CE,[28] there has been no universally recognized authority within Halakha. Maimonides (1135–1204) was one of the greatest scholars of the Middle Ages, and is arguably one of the most widely accepted scholars among the Jewish people since the closing of the Talmud in 500. Influenced by the rationalist school of thought and generally showing a preference for a natural (as opposed to miraculous) redemption for the Jewish people, Maimonides proposed a rationalist solution for achieving the goal of re-establishing the highest court in Jewish tradition and reinvesting it with the same authority it had in former years. There have been several attempts to implement Maimonides' recommendations, the latest being in modern times.
There have been rabbinical attempts to renew Semicha and re-establish a Sanhedrin by Rabbi Jacob Berab in 1538, Rabbi Yisroel Shklover in 1830, Rabbi Aharon Mendel haCohen in 1901, Rabbi Zvi Kovsker in 1940 and Rabbi Yehuda Leib Maimon in 1949.
In October 2004 (Tishrei 5765), a group of rabbis representing varied Orthodox communities in Israel undertook a ceremony in Tiberias,[29] where the original Sanhedrin was disbanded, in which it claimed to re-establish the body according to the proposal of Maimonides and the Jewish legal rulings of Rabbi Yosef Karo. The controversial attempt has been subject to debate within different Jewish communities.

See also

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen