In der jetzigen Corona-Krise fragen wir uns, die Hinterbliebenen und Überlebenden des Tsunami-Massakers Weihnachten 2004, immer wieder, wo waren damals die Auslandsgeheimdienste der Freien Welt, als es darum ging, die weitere Ausbreitung der humanitären Katastrophe die im Gange war zu verhindern.
Die Frage, wofür es den Auslandsgeheimdienst überhaut gibt, beantworten wir folgendermaßen: um auf die im Ausland auftauchenden Bedrohungen welcher Art auch immer sofort und adäquat zu reagieren und dadurch das bedrohte Leben eigener Bürger und ihre Sicherheit zu schützen als auch präventiv Schäden materieller und anderer Art abzuwenden.
Wie verhielt sich damals der zivile und militärische Auslandsgeheimdienst? Keiner von ihnen ist in Aktion getreten, keiner hat vor der in Thailand und woanders an den Küsten des Indischen Ozeans drohenden Katastrophe gewarnt, als Sumatras Küsten bereits in Schutt lagen und dort über 200.000 Menschen umgekommen waren - ein kriminelles Totalversagen also und ein Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit zugleich.
Danach haben all diese Dienste ihre maßgebliche Rolle daran komplett vertuscht (wie dies bereits drei Jahre zuvor beim 9/11 geschah, wo sie auch am Massensterben von Zivilisten kausal beteiligt waren), ihre Indolenz totgeschwiegen, ihre dreckigen, mit Blut eigener Bürger verschmierten Pfoten, in Unschuld gewaschen und sind dann auf Tauchstation gegangen. Bis heute haben sie in dem Zusammenhang keinen Mucks über ihr eigenes Verbrechen von sich gegeben. Und wir haben von ihnen auch kein Wort der Entschuldigung vernommen.
In der Corona-Pandemie haben sie abermals versagt und nun versuchen sie - diese indolenten Versager und Vertuscher in Permanenz - Licht zu werfen auf das, was ihrerseits eigentlich schon spätestens im Dezember 2019 hätte nicht unterblieben werden dürfen, nämlich WARNUNG VOR EINER DROHENDEN KATASTROPHE.
Wenn sie also in dem Kontext von einem "Anschlag auf die internationale Transparenz" Chinas, von "Unterdrückung frühzeitiger Warnungen" und von der "Zensur der Informationen" reden, dann ist es wie im Sprichwort: Ein Esel beschimpft das andere Langohr. Oder: Der Kessel schilt den Ofentopf – schwarz sind sie alle beide!
UNSERE INDOLENCE COMMUNITY (UND ZUSAMMEN MIT IHM UNSER DIPLOMATISCHER VERSAGERDIENST, ZUSAMMENGESETZT AUS FAULER PARTYLÖWEN) BEFINDEN SICH SCHON SEIT LANGEM SELBST IN DER EXISTENZIELLEN KRISE UND PRODUZIEREN AUFGRUND EIGENER INDOLENZ, KRIMINELLEN UNTÄTIGKEIT UND DES DARAUF REGELMÄßIG FOLGENDEN COVER-UP SELBST KATASTROPHALE KRISEN GLOBALEN AUSMAßES.
Jerzy Chojnowski
Chairman-GTVRG e.V.
###
"Anschlag auf die internationale Transparenz"
In einem westlichen Geheimdienstpapier wird China offenbar scharf für den Umgang mit der Corona-Krise kritisiert. Die australische Zeitung "Daily Telegraph" berichtet über ein Dossier der sogenannten "Five Eyes", einer Geheimdienstallianz, zu der sich die USA, Großbritannien, Australien, Kanada und Neuseeland zusammengeschlossen haben.
Das 15-seitige Papier dokumentiere die Vertuschung chinesischer Behörden und auf riskante Forschungsarbeiten in einem Labor in der chinesischen Stadt Wuhan hin, wo das neue Coronavirus im Dezember erstmals aufgetaucht war.
Das Papier bildet laut "Daily Telegraph" die Grundlage für die Vorwürfe, denen die Geheimdienste nachgehen. Es hält fest, wie Chinas Behörden frühzeitige Warnungen seiner Mediziner unterdrückten, das wahre Ausmaß des Ausbruchs herunterspielten und Informationen zensierten. Die Vertuschung werde in dem Dossier als "Anschlag auf die internationale Transparenz" beschrieben.
Besonders beklagt wird demnach, dass China noch bis zum 20. Januar bestritten hatte, dass sich das Virus von Mensch zu Mensch übertrage. Dafür habe es schon seit Anfang Dezember Hinweise gegeben, heißt es in dem Papier.
Zudem werde China darin vorgeworfen, Virusproben vernichtet zu haben und Veröffentlichungen von Wissenschaftlern über das Virus streng zu kontrollieren. Chinas Behörden hätten sich auch geweigert, Lebendproben internationalen Forschern zur Verfügung zu stellen. (3. Mai 2020, SPIEGEL)
Bundesaußenminister Heiko Maas (SPD) hat China dazu aufgerufen, sich an der Aufklärung über den Ursprung der Corona-Pandemie zu beteiligen. "Die ganze Welt hat ein Interesse, dass der genaue Ursprung des Virus geklärt wird", sagte Maas den Zeitungen der Funke Mediengruppe [sprich der Lügenpresse - J.Ch.].
"Fundierte Antworten darauf muss aber die Wissenschaft geben, nicht die Politik", fügte Maas hinzu. China könne hier unter Beweis stellen, "wie transparent es mit dem Virus tatsächlich umgehen will".
United States Intelligence Community
Seal of the United States Intelligence Community
| |
| Agency overview | |
|---|---|
| Formed | December 4, 1981 |
| Agency executive | |
| Website | intelligence |
The United States Intelligence Community (IC) is a group of separate United States government intelligence agencies and subordinate organizations, that work separately and together to conduct intelligence activities to support the foreign policy and national security of the United States. Member organizations of the IC include intelligence agencies, military intelligence, and civilian intelligence and analysis offices within federal executive departments. The IC is overseen by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which itself is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who reports to the President of the United States.[1][2]
Among their varied responsibilities, the members of the Community collect and produce foreign and domestic intelligence, contribute to military planning, and perform espionage. The IC was established by Executive Order 12333, signed on December 4, 1981, by U.S. President Ronald Reagan.[3]
The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that were working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances.[4] According to a 2008 study by the ODNI, private contractors make up 29% of the workforce in the U.S. intelligence community and account for 49% of their personnel budgets.[5]
Etymology
The term Intelligence Community was first used during LTG Walter Bedell Smith's tenure as Director of Central Intelligence (1950–1953).[6]
History
Intelligence is information that agencies collect, analyze, and distribute in response to government leaders' questions and requirements. Intelligence is a broad term that entails:
Executive Order 12333 charged the IC with six primary objectives:[8]
- Collection of information needed by the President, the National Security Council, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and other executive branch officials for the performance of their duties and responsibilities;
- Production and dissemination of intelligence;
- Collection of information concerning, and the conduct of activities to protect against, intelligence activities directed against the U.S., international terrorist and/or narcotics activities, and other hostile activities directed against the U.S. by foreign powers, organizations, persons and their agents;
- Special activities (defined as activities conducted in support of U.S. foreign policy objectives abroad which are planned and executed so that the "role of the United States Government is not apparent or acknowledged publicly", and functions in support of such activities, but which are not intended to influence United States political processes, public opinion, policies, or media and do not include diplomatic activities or the collection and production of intelligence or related support functions);
- Administrative and support activities within the United States and abroad necessary for the performance of authorized activities and
- Such other intelligence activities as the President may direct from time to time.
Organization
Members
The IC is headed by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), whose statutory leadership is exercised through the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The other 16 members of the IC are:[9]
Programs
The IC performs under two separate programs:
- The National Intelligence Program (NIP), formerly known as the National Foreign Intelligence Program as defined by the National Security Act of 1947 (as amended), "refers to all programs, projects, and activities of the intelligence community, as well as any other programs of the intelligence community designated jointly by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the head of a United States department or agency or by the President. Such term does not include programs, projects, or activities of the military departments to acquire intelligence solely for the planning and conduct of tactical military operations by the United States Armed Forces". Under the law, the DNI is responsible for directing and overseeing the NIP, though the ability to do so is limited (see the Organization structure and leadership section).
- The Military Intelligence Program (MIP) refers to the programs, projects, or activities of the military departments to acquire intelligence solely for the planning and conduct of tactical military operations by the United States Armed Forces. The MIP is directed and controlled by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. In 2005 the Department of Defense combined the Joint Military Intelligence Program and the Tactical Intelligence and Related Activities program to form the MIP.
Since the definitions of the NIP and MIP overlap when they address military intelligence, assignment of intelligence activities to the NIP and MIP sometimes proves problematic.
Organizational structure and leadership
The overall organization of the IC is primarily governed by the National Security Act of 1947 (as amended) and Executive Order 12333. The statutory organizational relationships were substantially revised with the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) amendments to the 1947 National Security Act.
Though the IC characterizes itself as a federation of its member elements,[10] its overall structure is better characterized as a confederation due to its lack of a well-defined, unified leadership and governance structure. Prior to 2004, the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) was the head of the IC, in addition to being the director of the CIA. A major criticism of this arrangement was that the DCI had little or no actual authority over the budgetary authorities of the other IC agencies and therefore had limited influence over their operations.
Following the passage of IRTPA in 2004, the head of the IC is the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). The DNI exerts leadership of the IC primarily through statutory authorities under which he or she:
- controls the "National Intelligence Program" budget;
- establishes objectives, priorities, and guidance for the IC; and
- manages and directs the tasking of, collection, analysis, production, and dissemination of national intelligence by elements of the IC.
However, the DNI has no authority to direct and control any element of the IC except his own staff—the Office of the DNI—neither does the DNI have the authority to hire or fire personnel in the IC except those on his own staff. The member elements in the executive branch are directed and controlled by their respective department heads, all cabinet-level officials reporting to the President. By law, only the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency reports to the DNI.[citation needed]
In light of major intelligence failures in recent years that called into question how well Intelligence Community ensures U.S. national security, particularly those identified by the 9/11 Commission (National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States), and the "WMD Commission" (Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction), the authorities and powers of the DNI and the overall organizational structure of the IC have become subject of intense debate in the United States.
Interagency cooperation
Previously, interagency cooperation and the flow of information among the member agencies was hindered by policies that sought to limit the pooling of information out of privacy and security concerns. Attempts to modernize and facilitate interagency cooperation within the IC include technological, structural, procedural, and cultural dimensions. Examples include the Intellipedia wiki of encyclopedic security-related information; the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Intelligence Centers, Program Manager Information Sharing Environment, and Information Sharing Council; legal and policy frameworks set by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, information sharing Executive Orders 13354 and Executive Order 13388, and the 2005 National Intelligence Strategy.
Budget
The U.S. intelligence budget (excluding the Military Intelligence Program) in fiscal year 2013 was appropriated as $52.7 billion, and reduced by the amount sequestered to $49.0 billion.[11] In fiscal year 2012 it peaked at $53.9 billion, according to a disclosure required under a recent law implementing recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.[12] The 2012 figure was up from $53.1 billion in 2010,[13] $49.8 billion in 2009,[14] $47.5 billion in 2008,[15] $43.5 billion in 2007,[16] and $40.9 billion in 2006.[17]
About 70 percent of the intelligence budget went to contractors for the procurement of technology and services (including analysis), according to the May 2007 chart from the ODNI. Intelligence spending has increased by a third over ten years ago, in inflation-adjusted dollars, according to the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.[citation needed]
In a statement on the release of new declassified figures, DNI Mike McConnell said[when?] there would be no additional disclosures of classified budget information beyond the overall spending figure because "such disclosures could harm national security". How the money is divided among the 16 intelligence agencies and what it is spent on is classified. It includes salaries for about 100,000 people, multibillion-dollar satellite programs, aircraft, weapons, electronic sensors, intelligence analysis, spies, computers, and software.
On August 29, 2013 The Washington Post published the summary of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's multivolume FY 2013 Congressional Budget Justification, the U.S. Intelligence Community's top-secret "black budget".[18][19][20] The IC's FY 2013 budget details how the 16 spy agencies use the money and how it performs against the goals set by the president and Congress. Experts said that access to such details about U.S. spy programs is without precedent. Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists, which provides analyses of national security issues, stated that "It was a titanic struggle just to get the top-line budget number disclosed, and that has only been done consistently since 2007 ... but a real grasp of the structure and operations of the intelligence bureaucracy has been totally beyond public reach. This kind of material, even on a historical basis, has simply not been available."[21] Access to budget details will enable an informed public debate on intelligence spending for the first time, said the co-chair of the 9/11 Commission Lee H. Hamilton. He added that Americans should not be excluded from the budget process because the intelligence community has a profound impact on the life of ordinary Americans.[21]
Oversight
Intelligence Community Oversight duties are distributed to both the Executive and Legislative branches. Primary Executive oversight is performed by the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, the Joint Intelligence Community Council, the Office of the Inspector General, and the Office of Management and Budget. Primary congressional oversight jurisdiction over the IC is assigned to two committees: the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The House Armed Services Committee and Senate Armed Services Committee draft bills to annually authorize the budgets of DoD intelligence activities, and both the House and Senate appropriations committees annually draft bills to appropriate the budgets of the IC. The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs took a leading role in formulating the intelligence reform legislation in the 108th Congress.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen